If people have believed in religious propagated myths for many generations, the length of time does not prove it true.
Bhagavan Buddha: ~ Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.
The path of truth is the path of verification. Nothing has to be accepted as truth without verification.
Religious Scholars or pundits believed it is enough
to read, to accumulate knowledge from books. They think they have mastered
Vedas and Upanishads and the other scriptures, and they looked upon other people
as ignorant, as illiterate people who are not studied Vedas and Upanishads.
In one sense, you can say Gnani is illiterate because his Gnana is
nothing to do with the scriptural mastery. If you consider a scholar as
literate, as a well-educated man, then a Gnani is definitely illiterate.
But of what value is the scholar’s accumulated
knowledge? A scholar will go on and on about the immortality of the Soul but
when death approaches you will find him trembling and weeping and wailing. All
this talk of immortality will crumble into nothingness because he has not known
it.
Sage Sankara says: ~ From the point of
any of these four uses karma is of no use for attaining liberation. Remaining in
the Soul, the Self’s own true form is released. It consists in realizing the
true nature of the Self which is ever-existent and eternal. Moksha, therefore,
is not something to be produced, for it is eternal (nityatvat). It is not
something to be purified, for it is bereft of all qualities and impurities
(nirgunatvat, nirdoshatvat cha). There is also another reason here. It cannot
be purified since it is not a means (asadhanadravyatmakatvat). Only a thing
that serves as a means can be purified, as the sacrificial vessel or clarified
butter by a sprinkling of water and so on. (commentary on Bhr, Upanishads 3-3-1)
Sage
Sankara says: ~
Karma is not competent to remove ignorance, for it is
not opposed to it. It does not matter in what way we characterize ignorance,
whether as the absence of knowledge or as doubt or as erroneous knowledge. It is
always removable by knowledge, but not by action in any of its forms, for there
is no contradiction between ignorance and karma. (Commentary on
Brah.3-3-1 )
Taittiriya Vartika, verse-24: ~ There is also another reason for rejecting this view. Karma involves duality in the form of means and end, doer and deed. The perception of duality is ignorance. Further, it is only a person who has the desire to perform karma. Since he is ignorant of the non-dual Self, he thinks that there are objects other than the Self which he should strive for and that there are persons for whom he should suffer in his body. "He struggles desiring something for himself, something else for his son, the third thing for his wife and so on and gets involved in the cycle of births and deaths." (Brh. Up. Sankara's Commentary, 4-4-12)
In short, karma presupposes desire, involves duality, and is, therefore, a
product of avidya. If so, how
can it destroy avidya, the root
cause of bondage, and thereby cause liberation?
No comments:
Post a Comment