Advaitic wisdom is potent but bitter medicine for those imprisoned by
orthodox ideology. The Vedas talk about Brahman which refers to the ultimate
truth or ultimate reality. The consciousness is the ultimate truth, therefore,
the consciousness is Brahman and Brahman is God in truth.
Sage Sankara is Jagadguru for
the ignorant populace and Brahma Gnani for the seeking world.
Sage Sankara’s wisdom
is nothing to do orthodox belief systems. Sage
Sankara is
the only sage who has final authority on the Advaitic truth. The Advaitic truth
is rational truth and scientific truth without dogma.
Religion is nothing to do with Advaita. Advaitic sect belongs to
religion. Advaita is pure spirituality. Advaitic sect is dualistic is nothing
to do with the Advaitic truth which is hidden by the illusion. Mixing religion
and spirituality is like mixing oil and water.
Religion is regarded as sacred and real by the common people, by the
wise as false and by the politicians as useful.
The religion and its sects are based on the form, time, and space
whereas the Spirituality is based on the Atman the formless, timeless and
spaceless existence.
Religions hold birth, life, death, and the world as a reality. From
the ultimate standpoint, the world in which we exist is an illusion created out
the Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness.
Advaitic sect holds the world (illusion) as a
reality whereas the Sage Sankara says the world as an illusion. Therefore, the
individual experience of birth, life, death, rebirth, sin, karma, and personal
gods and rituals belongs to the illusion.
Thus, Advaitic religious sect is path meant for the ignorant populace,
which is incapable of grasping the Advaitic wisdom hidden by the Maya or
illusion.
The seeker must know the difference between religion and
spirituality. Many people think the religion itself as spirituality.
Spirituality leads to discovering the truth which is hidden by the form,
time, and space.
Advaita is universal. Advaita is the nature of the Soul, the innermost
Self. The world in which you exist is created out of single stuff. That single
stuff is consciousness. Knowledge of the single stuff is Advaitic wisdom.
Sage Sankara’s wisdom
is nothing to do with the orthodox belief systems. Some philosophers in the
past dissented from this interpretation of Vedanta philosophy, holding that the
incarnated Souls were separate from the Divine Essence and only finally merged
with it after the cycles of birth.
All these theoretical philosophies are based on the
imagination based on the false ‘Self’ (ego or you) within the false experience
(waking).
Orthodox people argue that Sage Sankara had
a Guru. Sage Sankara himself’
was Guru.
Yes, for orthodox people he is Jagadguru but for the seeker of truth, he is
a Brahma Gnani.
The traditionally religious people are so entangled in orthodox
religiosity; it is very difficult for them to free themselves from
narrow-minded prejudices and dogmas and superstitions. These educated orthodox
people are more ignorant than illiterate. They strongly stuck to their
inherited orthodox baggage meant for the ignorant populace. Even though their
own Sage has said that orthodoxy meant for the ignorant populace they ignore
and they are like blind led by another blind follow the inherited blind belief.
Vedas do not permit idol worship. All the idols are of the Puranic Gods
Priests are referring to the Puranic Brahma as GOD they are ignorant of the God
in Vedas even though they speak of Vedas.
Priests do not who understands the meaning of the Brahman, which is present
in the form of consciousness.
The word Brahman means ultimate truth or reality which cannot be
indicated by any word. The Brahman can be expressed through silence because it
is beyond the experience form, time, and space. Therefore, the word Brahman in
the clearly stands for the essence of the three states, which is consciousness
only. The Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana is for realize the Soul
is the Self. The Soul is present in the form of consciousness.
Sage Sankara opposed the Buddhists only, who misunderstood Bhagavan Buddha and became atheists. According to Sage Sankara meditation always means the critical analysis of
the Self to get salvation from the worldly tensions. Due to the eccentric ego
of the then atheists, Sage Sankara did not go beyond this since the
atheists will not accept God beyond themselves. This limitation is not due to
limited knowledge of Sage Sankara but is due to the then-existing situation of the
psychology of the surrounding society.
Even Bhagavan Buddha kept
silent about God because the society dealt by Him consisted of Purvamimamsakas,
who were strong atheists. Bhagavan
Buddha told that everything including the
Self is only relatively real (Sunya). This is correct because the Self is a
part of the universe, which is relatively real with respect to the absolute
unimaginable God. The Bhagavan Buddha stopped at this point because the atheists cannot
realize the existence of unimaginable God indicated through His silence.
The point of Buddha is that if God is non-existent,
the entire creation including Self is non-existent. Sage Sankara wanted to establish the existence of the Brahman.
For this purpose, He made the Atman as the Brahman. He brought out the identity
of Self with the consciousness and made the Atman the Brahman. Since one will
not negate the existence of his Self, he will accept the existence of the
Brahman, which is the Atman or Soul the innermost Self. Both Bhagavan Buddha and Sage
Sankara kept
silent about the absolute unimaginable God. The same philosophy was dealt with by
them from different angles in different situations.
Exploring if an outside observer can, in all cases,
determine if a person is Enlightened or not, the venerated Indian Sanyasin, Sage Sankara), in his work The
Crest-Jewel of Discrimination (1) or as it is sometimes known, Viveka Chudamani
(2), states that the Knower of the Atman (i.e., a Gnani) "bears no outward
mark of a holy man" (Stanza 539). Continuing, although there are variances
found in the actual wording between various translators and translations the
gist behind the words remains the same, Sage
Sankara writes: - “Sometimes he appears to be a Fool,
sometimes a wise man. Sometimes he seems splendid as a king, sometimes
feeble-minded. Sometimes he is calm and silent. Sometimes he draws men to him.
Sometimes people honor him greatly, sometimes they insult him. Sometimes they
ignore him.
Sage Sankara pokes fun at ascetics and points out that all their
austerities do not cause desires to go “(Altar
Flowers" Page 205, v.2 P.207 v.4.)
Sage Sankara says: ~ Whatever
thing remains eternal is true, and whatever is non-eternal is untrue. Since the
world is created and destroyed, it is not true.
Advaitic Truth is the thing that is unchanging. Since the world is
changing, it is not true.
Whatever is independent of space and time is true, and whatever has
space and time in itself are untrue.
Just as one sees dreams in sleep, he sees a kind of super-dream when he
is waking. The world is compared to this conscious dream.
The world is believed to be a superimposition of the Brahman.
Superimposition cannot be true.
On the other hand, Sage Sankara claims that the world is not absolutely false. It
appears false only when compared to Brahman. In the pragmatic state, the world
is completely true—which occurs as long as we are under the influence of Maya.
The world cannot be both true and false at the same time; hence Sage Sankara has classified the world as indescribable. The
following points suggest that according to Sage Sankara, the world is not
false (Sage Sri, Sankara himself gave most of the arguments)
This Māyāvāda of Sage Sankara was highly criticized and misunderstood.
Bhaskaracharya described Sage
Sankara to
be indebted to the Buddhists for his concept of Maya. (The term Maya, however,
appears in the Bhagavad Gita 7.14 and also in many Upanishads).
The concept of Māyā seems to be a hypothesis. Since
according to the Upanishads, only Brahman is real, but we see the material world
to be real, Sage Sankara explained the anomaly by the concept
of this illusionary power Māyā.
Sage Sankara: ~ “The
world, filled with attachments and aversions, and the rest, is like a dream: it
appears to be real as long as one is ignorant, but becomes unreal when one is
awake.
Sage Sankara: ~ “As
fire is the direct cause of cooking, so knowledge, and not any other form of
discipline, is the direct cause of Liberation; for Liberation cannot be
attained without Knowledge." (Self- Knowledge).
Sage Sankara: ~ As
the moon appears to be moving when the clouds move in the sky, so also to the
non-discriminating. Atman appears to be active when in reality the senses are
active.
The Soul is the Self. The Soul is present in the form of consciousness.
The consciousness is the ultimate truth or Brahman or God. The consciousness
alone is real; the world is merely an illusion. The world in which we exist has
no independent existence apart from consciousness. The world in which we exist
is not different from consciousness because the world is created out of
consciousness. The Soul, the Self is eternal, impersonal awareness, one without the
second.: ~ Santthosh Kumaar

No comments:
Post a Comment